Pages

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Course of Zion

Hating Muslims seems to be regarded as high fashion by non-Muslims in the West today, people who rather whore themselves to Jews than ever consider coming to a mutual understanding with Muslims, people whose opinion is largely based on highly dubious quotations from the Qu’ran while hypocritically, of course, ignoring the hate-filled Talmud and quotations such as “A heretic non-Jew you may kill outright with your own hands.” (Abodah Zara, 4b.) or “Every Jew who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.” (Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772.)



Graffiti by IDF using Palestinian blood inside a Palestinian home


One may question the reasoning of these people, whom we call ZC (Zionist Correct), and how they came to such conclusion. Either they are misinformed, or they are aware of their hypocrisy but choose to assist Jews with full knowledge of their intentions.

Should one dare explain the truth to them, they immediately go berserk and resort to repeating statements such as ”At least they are not invading our countries!” (of course not, they already control them) or ”At least they aren’t raping our women!” (look up sex slavery in Israel) and so weiter.

What they don’t seem to grasp is that someone said that multiculturalism was good*, someone invited Muslims to migrate, and then someone started saying multiculturalism was bad* as soon as Muslims actually showed up. (*Multiculturalism is not a bad idea in theory, just the way it is exploited.)

Having recognized how close their mischevious race and Dark Spirit of Yhwh was to have their final judgement served to them in aftermath of our last major holy Kampf, the Jews with their cunning array of deception were determined not to let such a threat grow amongst their host population again. Therefore, to guise the real problem - that is themselves, they encourage immigration of many groups, including Muslims. They create a series of false-flag attacks, blame them on the Muslims, manipulates the general population through the media to believe in a Muslim takeover, creates a widespread fear of sharia, women mistreatment, terrorism and so on so forth.

Sounds familiar?

All of which has a hidden agenda, of course. So, what benefit can they possibly gain from such an act of deceptive provocation? First, by creating such a heterogenous society containing people constantly played off against each other, they manage to keep us internally disorganised, and by aiming our attention against each other and away from the actual problem, it gives the Jews a green light to continue their plot of world domination relatively unhindered.

Unfortunately, only a handful of people recognize this and few understand how both these sides are played off against one another and how many of both our people die blind in a carefully thought and laid out show of deception while Israel profits and expands its dominion.

Secondly, they seem to want to make Europeans feel threatened by Muslims enough to support Israel no matter what. ”Hey, I don’t like Muslims either,” says the Jew ”Let me help you.” It is easy to calculate the next step from here.

With the loyalty of Europe's ZC non-Muslims at their disposal, Zion's only real hindrance, the genuine Muslim community, would easily be disposed of and the Middle East would lie open to the exploitation of the Jew, as would Europe. The plan to establish a worldwide Jewish supremacy via instigation of conflict between different groups of non-Jews, the aim described in the Protocols of Zion, would succeed.

The world would enter a state of Zion, a process that has been ongoing at a gradual but rapid rate since 1945 and at an even faster rate since the false-flag operation carried out by the CIA and Mossad in the US Sept. 11 2001. Ever since this event, we have had an agressive campaign by companies headed by certain rich people to make us accept ever-increasing surveillance and violation of alleged rights and privacy in the name of security. Our ‘security’ of course that will not stop until the world, now wholly dominated by Jews in all spheres of political and social life, has entered a state of a sustainable system of slavery in which internal rebellion is no longer possible.

By the time ZCs realize what evil they’ve helped to pave the way for, it will be too late. (Or perhaps they will not even mind, as long as Jews toss them a few pro-European scraps from the table.)


Ted Ekeroth (Jew), 100% pro-Europe, 100% Zionist


Reject the lies of the filthy Jew, and rid yourself from his influence over you!

Creative women and men of all nations and races, recognize your common enemy!

Source: http://unipax.wordpress.com/2011/04/26/course-of-zion

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Lies, Damned Lies, and "Personal Stories"




Recently the Islamophobes have hit a new low of confirmation bias, or as we like to call it, dissimulation. (This is also true of our other enemies, and I strongly suggest calling it out at every opportunity possible.)

Remember the good old days when factual claims required verification by reliable sources? We who went through the information war from 9/11 onwards know all about this first-hand: if the source is likely to have a particular bias, all its factual claims that serve that bias must at least be corroborated by another source without the same bias before being taken seriously.

Compare this to the linked articles, in which the authors, who have declared political agendas, can simply tell personal stories without any kind of evidence for the events described, and expect to be believed. And they are believed, at least by their fans. Does it occur to these fans that such stories could be entirely fictitious, invented for the sole purpose of propaganda? Unfortunately not. This is what I want to highlight: our enemies are not just wrong in their beliefs, they are not even clear-minded in the way they reinforce their beliefs.

Our response to all such personal stories should be simple: if the author does not verify them, they did not happen. NEVER waste time arguing over the implications of the events described; the author first needs to convince us they occurred at all. And NEVER be drawn into the scam of being challenged to disprove the events; the sceptic is not required to disprove anything. Who stands to benefit from the claim? The claimant. That is the party on which the burden of proof lies.

Otherwise, we might as well start believing (or think it is up to us to disprove) the personal stories of so-called "Holocaust survivors".

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Hate Speech Double Standards



Reading through the GOV website, the logic of the highbrow intellectuals running it is monotonously flawed and tiresome. There is fundamentally nothing ethical about the arguments on their website, which this post aims to reveal.

The article refers to a video of an unknown British Muslim by the name of Abu Mounisa. Whether or not his call for Western society to be replaced by Islam is justifiable, as well as whether he can be described as an authority on genuine Islam, will not be discussed in this post. Indeed, for the sake of argument, I will make the same assumption that the author has with his comparison of Abu Mounisa to Anjem Choudary i.e. that what this Muslim is calling for is immoral and unethical.

The complaint is common amongst tribalists, and this particular form of it is a hallmark of not only explicit White Nationalists but also their various allies under every banner, including these self-proclaimed "counterjihadists". Asking rhetorically why “he doesn’t get arrested for ‘inciting religious hatred’”, the author attempts to reveal a double standard. If Abu Mounisa is breaching hate speech laws in the same way that the non-Muslims of Britain are breaching them, then both should be tried equally – perfectly logical.

However, the immorality of the tribalism of the Gates of Vienna is revealed two sentences later:

“There are two sets of them: one for Muslims, and one for everyone else”.
It is evident by the website’s content (a quick search of ‘hate speech’ will suffice) that they oppose hate-speech laws. Hence, they do not wish to end the hatred between Muslim and non-Muslim by removing what they perceive as a double standard, but instead call for the removal of hate-speech laws altogether; allowing a free-for-all of racial, cultural and religious warfare

Furthermore, the images – not-to-mention the recurring theme present in their blog posts – displaying the website’s support for Israel and Zionism reveal what we have said about tribalists all along: they may actually seek to remove perceived double standards between their group and other groups, but only insofar as they seek an easier platform to combat the out-group with the same methods they have complained about being used against them all this time.

They say they predict civil war in Europe, but it would be more accurate to describe them as attempting to incite it. In the unfortunate event that paranoia towards Muslims does escalate into violence in the future, let us not forget whom to hold to account for such developments. And even if it does not, at least we know GOV and the groups they support tried their absolute best to make it happen.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

New Kristallnacht?

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2004/10/new-kristallnacht.html

The website's subtitle reads: "We are in a new phase of a very old war." I think an appropriately ridiculous additional subtitle would be: "The West, 2011 - Muslim Nazis storming the New Jerusalem to eat Christians and rape Jewish virgins."

These people are worse than perfect examples of ZC Gentiles. They believe in an alliance with Zionists not only out of necessity, but as desirable in and of itself.

Does the West stand on the threshold of a new Kristallnacht?
So does the West stand on the threshold of a new Kristallnacht? Perhaps. Though, certainly Jews will not be the victims.


Everywhere, Zionists (including their Gentile advocates) are at war with Muslims, and conducting this war with unimaginable hypocrisy and ferocity. However, the world is instead kept aware of imaginary anti-Semitism in every nook and cranny.

The next section of the article is a series of fragmented accounts used as evidence to support the notion that anti-Semitism is rampant and will lead to a second Holocaust. There is no real reason why these are in the article, as they contribute very little.

It is the section on Western civilisation that shows the tribalism of Gates of Vienna. Since it is our Western civilisation, it is right and we must protect it! The Jewish contributions to Western civilisation are espoused, without reference to the vastly more significant impact of the Islamic contribution to Western civilisation; which led to the rediscovery of the classical texts. Funnily enough, there is an extensive article centring on Aristotle (Aristotle and the History of Scientific Logic) on their website, whose works were translated from Arabic, after having been lost to Europeans.

The rest is mostly a misunderstanding of history. The author relies on the most rabidly Judaised Christianity one could conjure to distort the reality of Jesus’ and Christianity’s mission; by referring to anything but the words of Jesus (aryanism.net/religion/christianity/words-of-jesus). Furthermore, the author ignores the tremendous influence of Roman Law on Western law, and incorrectly sources the Jewish tradition as the only Biblical influence on Western law.

As final proof of all the evils that Gates of Vienna condones, I will quote the final paragraph of this article:

"Whether or not it is 1933 (or 1936, or 1938) all over again, it is time for the West to make a stand. Before the shards of glass cover the pavement in front of Jewish businesses in the new Kristallnacht; before laws are passed restricting the rights of Jews; before whole families are shot and bulldozed into mass graves; before the mushroom cloud rises over Tel Aviv -- Western Civilization must stand up and be counted. We must say, with the Jews, ‘Never Again.’"

And in case you were too dumbfounded to comprehend this, the article concludes in bold type:

I stand with the Jews.”